<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>speed on servergnome</title>
    <link>https://www.horza.org/tags/speed/</link>
    <description>Recent content in speed on servergnome</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <managingEditor>horzadome@gmail.com (horza)</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>horzadome@gmail.com (horza)</webMaster>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.horza.org/tags/speed/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>btrfs</title>
      <link>https://www.horza.org/post/77-btrfs-is-it-better-or-just-butter/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>horzadome@gmail.com (horza)</author>
      <guid>https://www.horza.org/post/77-btrfs-is-it-better-or-just-butter/</guid>
      <description>Surprised by the number of articles all around t3h interwebz about btrfs having problems and saying it corrups/hangs/overheads , I&amp;rsquo;ve decided to describe my really pleasant desktop use experience.
Use case is quite simple. I have 3 drives that are used to keep data on my computer. Data being video and audio files, all kinds of linux-based distro images, torrents and vm machines that I use for testing purposes. I consider all of this data expendable, meaning that I would not be sorry if any of it got deleted or corrupted.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
